Controversies over historical interpretation have become a key focus of contemporary politics. Recently, these issues have taken on particular prominence in Europe, where a burgeoning array of “memory laws” has sparked heated debates. While laws prohibiting Holocaust denial are their progenitors, most of the newer laws are intended to shape, rather than simply to reflect, social norms about how the past should be understood and discussed. They also reflect concerns about maintaining national unity and cultural coherence in the face of European integration. As such, these laws constitute both a response to the postnational order and a threat to liberalism.
About the Authors
George Soroka
George Soroka is lecturer on government and assistant director of undergraduate studies at Harvard University. He is coeditor of Ukraine After Maidan: Revisiting Domestic and Regional Security (2018).
Félix Krawatzek is senior researcher at the Centre for East European and International Studies in Berlin and an associate member of Nuffield College, Oxford. He is author ofYouth in Regime Crisis: Comparative Perspectives from Russia to Weimar Germany (2018).
Contra Ben Margulies, one can clearly mark the boundaries that separate antidemocrats from democrats (nativists included), and nativists from populists.
Political polarization is not always bad for democracy. What is more, a tendency of major parties to converge into some kind of “grand coalition of the center” poses serious risks…
The gilets jaunes movement erupted suddenly but has now apparently subsided without leaving a significant impact on electoral politics. Yet the tensions that gave rise to the working-class protests remain…
