All sides in the debates about how and when to democratize appear to agree on one thing: The Singaporean government has been responsible for the economic progress of this illiberal democracy. Many of the government’s policies have indeed enabled a remarkable growth of per capita national income in the country during the last four decades. Yet Singapore’s present economic problems, and the government’s responsibility for the emergence of these, have been underreported. If Singapore had been a liberal democracy, the government would not have been able to muffle the political voices that could have mitigated some of the country’s current economic woes.
About the Authors
Marco Verweij
Marco Verweij is professor of political science at Jacobs University in Bremen, Germany, and coeditor of Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: Governance, Politics and Plural Perceptions (2006).
Riccardo Pelizzo is Research Fellow at the Centre for Governance and Public Policy at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia, and coeditor of The Role of Parliaments in Curbing Corruption (2006).
China’s government looks to Singapore, the only country in the region to modernize without liberalizing, in hopes of finding the key to combining authoritarian rule with economic progress and “good…
The strong state in Malaysia and Singapore best explains why their authoritarian regimes have proved so stable and enduring. That is also the reason why democratization would go smoothly in…
