COVID-19 Update: NED is continuing to operate during this worldwide health emergency, and to make grants in support of democracy.
However, our office is closed to the public and all in-person events and meetings have been postponed, cancelled or are occurring virtually.

Transitions to the Rule of Law

Issue Date January 2010
Volume 21
Issue 1
Page Numbers 31-44
file Print
arrow-down-thin Download from Project MUSE
external View Citation

Read the full essay here.

Liberal democracy is held to be a combination of two sets of institutions—democratic ones that ensure that governments are accountable to popular choice, and liberal ones that provide for a rule of law. The latter has historically been understood as a body of rules of justice that bind a community together, something broader in scope than the property rights regimes which are the focus of most academic literature on the subject. In contrast to other law-governed societies, Western Europe was exceptional insofar as law was institutionalized earlier and to a higher degree than elsewhere on the force of factors such as codification, legal specialization, institutional autonomy, and the correspondence between law and social norms.

About the Author

Francis Fukuyama is the Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow, director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, and professor (by courtesy) of political science at Stanford University.

View all work by Francis Fukuyama