The 2011 elections were the first polls of the postconflict period in which the government of the DRC, rather than the international community, drove the process, providing most of the funds and managing most aspects of the balloting. Credible elections would have marshaled the political and social forces necessary to consolidate peace and democracy. Instead, the Congolese government and its international partners failed to live up to these promises and expectations. The presidential majority’s determination to maintain power at all costs and the international actors’ lack of commitment to democracy in the DRC have led to a paralyzing crisis of legitimacy.
About the Authors
Mvemba Phezo Dizolele
Mvemba Phezo Dizolele is a writer and distinguished visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.
Pascal Kalume Kambale is director of the country office of the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA) in Kinshasa, DRC, and deputy-director of the Open Society Foundations’ Africa Governance Monitoring and Advocacy Project (AfriMAP).
As more and more African presidents attempt to remove or circumvent constitutional term limits, African populations increasingly are mobilizing en masse, at great risk, to defend their constitutions.
The holding of competitive elections in this vast, strife-torn country must count as a significant achievement, even though voters signaled their disaffection with the entire array of political elites that…