Read the full essay here.
Jason Brownlee and Kenny Miao offer an important corrective to the current mood of despair about democracy’s trajectory. Democratic failure, they argue, is not inevitable, and is not even tightly linked to the phenomenon of democratic backsliding. Wealth, in particular, remains an insulating factor that protects democracies from paying the ultimate price. In response, I have three points to make. First, the distinction between breakdown and backsliding in their account is not as sharp as it could be. This blunts some of the force of the argument. Second, I agree with the authors that erosion—rather than democratic death—is what we should be concerned about. It is easy to imagine significant erosion in the United States, beyond what we have experienced, without a full-fledged collapse. Third, I argue that what some pejoratively call “tyrannophobia” is endogenous to democratic survival. Indeed, hand-wringing can be necessary to keep democratic competition alive.
Read the Debate
- Jason Brownlee and Kenny Miao, “Why Democracy Survives”
RESPONSES
- Yascha Mounk, “The Danger Is Real”
- Nancy Bermeo, “Questioning Backsliding”
- Tom Ginsburg, “The Value of ‘Tyrannophobia’”
- Susan D. Hyde and Elizabeth N. Saunders, “Follow the Leader”
REBUTTAL
- Jason Brownlee and Kenny Miao, “A Quiet Consensus”
Image Credit: Ezra Acayan/Getty Images