In March 2013, Kenyans took to the polls in what turned out to be another disputed election. Unlike the 2007 elections, however, the 2013 elections and their aftermath were relatively peaceful. Yet a series of crucial mistakes by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission cast doubt on whether the election was, in the parlance of election-observer missions, “free and fair.” Rather than foreshadowing a new institutional equilibrium, the relative peace of the 2013 election may simply reflect a temporary alignment of fortuitous circumstances.
About the Authors
James D. Long
James D. Long is academy scholar at Harvard University and assistant professor of political science at the University of Washington.
Wracked by postelection violence in 2007 and 2008, Kenya embarked upon a course of constitutional change that culminated in an August 2010 referendum. How was the new basic law framed…
For years Kenya was regarded as one of Africa’s sturdiest democracies. The fraudulent 2007 presidential election, however, exposed the fragility of Kenya’s democratic framework.
After falling short in 1992 and 1997, Kenya’s large but fractious opposition coalition swept to victory at the polls in 2002. Transition has arrived, but can democratic transformation follow?
